May Annals Audio Summary/Podcast is up: Click here for the audio!

Highlights this month:
-The UK 4-hour length of stay rule – what can we learn?
-Episodes of care: how will EM payment structures work in a new world?
-ED closures: who does it hurt most?
-Banana bags – bringing change to a department
-Does viral testing in the ED reduce antibiotic prescribing?
-Pharmacists in the ED: saving the day, invisibly
-Nontechnical EP skills: how to find them

Email us any time at annalsaudio@acep.org, talk to you soon,
David and Ashley

No Comments

ACEP and the Choosing Wisely Campaign

ACEP President Dr. David SeabergA campaign called Choosing Wisely has gotten some attention of late because of its stated goal of reducing health care costs by eliminating tests and procedures that are not “necessary.” Since Choosing Wisely launched, nine medical specialty organizations have offered up their top five items for the chopping block.  These range from CT scans for fainting from the American College of Physicians to antibiotics for chronic sinusitis from the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology.

ACEP was asked to join the campaign in 2011, and after extensive review and discussion at the Committee level, ACEP declined.  There are several reasons for our initial response:

  • Emergency physicians have no right of refusal with our patients and often pick up the slack for other members of our esteemed profession. A recent member poll showed that 97% of us report seeing patients on a daily basis who are sent to the emergency department by their primary care physician. Many of these patients have been sent in with expressed instructions from the family physician to have this or that test ordered either because their office practice is swamped, the office is closed, or they lack the facilities to perform these tests. 
     
  • ABIM, the organization sponsoring the campaign, refused to allow any discussion of liability reform as a component of the Choosing Wisely campaign. To quote from the letter ACEP Past President Dr. Sandy Schneider sent to Daniel Wolfson, ABIM’s Executive VP and COO: “This is a significant issue in emergency medicine and a critical factor as to why emergency physicians order the number of tests and procedures they do.  Unlike primary care physicians, emergency physicians are not chosen by their patients, who have a greater tendency to sue for any perceived untoward event. In addition, we often lack prior care information. It is simply not possible for emergency physicians to talk about reducing ‘unnecessary’ testing without including messages about the need for medical liability reform.”
     
  • Emergency physicians approach our patients with the goal of eliminating anything life threatening. We cannot afford to miss anything, even something that seems like a long-shot. The consequences may be life or death for our patients. A test that is unnecessary for 99 patients may save the life of patient number 100.
     
  • Emergency medical care constitutes just 2 percent of all health care spending in the United States, no doubt in part because so much of the care we deliver is uncompensated. We are masters of efficiency and improvisation but there is only so far a dollar can be stretched. Emergency departments have been closing at an alarming rate across the country because so much care isn’t paid for. This is not the place to cut costs any further.
     
  • Lastly, should ACEP participate in this campaign, it very well may assure that emergency physicians will not receive reimbursement for the five identified procedures or tests.

ACEP is dedicated to advancing emergency care and promoting evidence-based quality improvement measures for its patients. To that end, we are reevaluating our response to the Choosing Wisely campaign by developing a workgroup, comprised of members from the Reimbursement, Medical-Legal, EM Practice, Clinical Policies, Quality and Performance, and Public Relations Committees to examine the issue and prepare a proposal for ACEP Board consideration.

DAVID SEABERG, MD, FACEP
President, American College of Emergency Physicians

,

8 Comments

A Second Chance

Please send your stories to Tracy Napper (tnapper@acep.org) today!

By Gerald A. Coleman, III, DO, FACEP

Driving in to my shift in mid-December 2009, it was snowing out. As a child, I loved the snow, but as grew older, I learned to dislike its presence when I had to drive to work in it. It reminded me of my daily commute when I went to medical school in New England. I could only think of all of the stuff I had to get done before the holidays which were quickly approaching. We are all guilty at times of getting caught up in the daily grind of our lives. My mind was on the various holiday distractions but soon it would be filled with an experience that would change my life. My shift that day started out being a typical case load of chest pain, sore throats, elderly abdominal pain and dementia patients with change in mental status. Halfway through my shift, the command radio went off alerting me to a possible stroke alert coming inbound to my emergency department which was at 110% with typical inpatient holds. Their ETA was less than 5 minutes. I discharged two of my patients in preparation for this critically ill patient who was inbound. Moments later, the medic busted through the door, yelling for a doc because his “stroke alert” patient was now vomiting and becoming more confused. I rushed to bed #8, our trauma resuscitation room, to evaluate a burly 62-year-old male with a long, partially gray beard. When I asked what was going on he simply stated: “Doc, I feel like crap and my head is going to explode.” His exam was non focal but I cleared the CT scanner with the tech via phone and we rushed him over immediately because I was concerned about a non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. The patient’s GCS at this time was 14.
The next of kin showed up with another 12 family members in tow. She was visibly upset and told me that her husband John was cutting down a Christmas tree with his grandkids when he screamed out and collapsed under the tree with the ax by his side. He was found by his youngest granddaughter who ran over to her and stated, “Pop Pop is hurt, Gammy.” John came to, stating he felt like an M-80 firecracker went off in his head. The CT tech phoned over to ED asking me to come over to the CT suite immediately. He stated: “Looks like John is not going to ride his motorcycle anytime soon.”
When I arrived, I stared at the monitor and dropped my head, my worst fear was confirmed; there was a large subdural and subarachnoid space extending into the R large ventricle with substantial mass effect at the level of the foramen magnum. We rushed John back over to the ED; en route he started to violently vomit all over my scrubs. I felt this was a bad omen and prepared to RSI the patient. His airway was predicted to be difficult so I made various adjustments in positioning John prior to securing his airway. When the respiratory tech came in to the room she immediately called the operator to page anesthesia. I looked up and stated, “Please give me a chance before you call in the cavalry, what gives?” I later learned that this respiratory tech was the niece of the patient and he had had airway trouble in the past with elective surgery. After I intubated John on the second attempt and made appropriate arrangements to transfer him to the receiving hospital, I sat down and talked to his family.
I walked into that room with a very uneasy feeling about the outcome of this case. One of the things that I learned early on in my career when dealing with families during a difficult case is to be truthful, direct, and professional. His wife asked me a direct question to which the entire room hung on my every word: “Dr. Coleman, is my husband going to die; you know his dad died the same way.” I had been through the gut-wrenching experience of losing a child at birth during my residency, so her fear was palpable and personal to me. This experience brought back unpleasant images of my deceased daughter. I simply stated while trying to ignore a salty tear streaming down my face, “We are going to do everything in our power to help John, I am in full court mode right now, take one step at time, he is a fighter, we can only hope for the best and prepare for the worse, time will only tell.”
Medevac had aborted the round trip 35-minute flight to the receiving hospital due to snow and low visibility, so my ground ALS crew was standing by to take John. I had to send an RN with John and the ALS crew because I started the following intravenous drips: cardene, mannitol and proprofol. John made it down to the receiving hospital’s interventional radiology suite in record time: door to IR suite within 86 minutes. This was amazing considering it was a 52-mile ground transport in suboptimal driving conditions.
After the dust settled, John had a protracted course in the ICU, staying there and in rehab for the next 4 months. He was finally discharged. Life went on in the ED as usual and a year passed. That year was a rough one for me because I survived my first year as a medical director after only being board certified for 6 months. A year later, to the exact day that John had his near fatal subarachnoid hemorrhage, I was working clinically when a middle-aged male without a beard come up to the physician charting area of the ED. I politely asked, “How can I help you today?” This gentleman’s eyes had strange familiarity to them. I said to myself, “Where have I seen this guy before?” He replied: “Hi Dr. Coleman, my name is John, and I wanted to say thank you in person for saving my life and giving me a second birthday.” I stood up for the desk in utter shock, “My god, John, you look amazing.” He had lost a ton of weight and lost the beard. He walked me to the conference room and there were more than twenty of his family members waiting to see me. Anyone who knows me well knows that I have an iron-clad exterior but at times can be emotionally sensitive when the time is right. I became overwhelmed with emotion as I listened to his family tell me John’s success over the last year in his recovery. We exchanged hugs, tears of joy, laughs, and simple stories of the heart. There are defining moments in your career; this was one of mine.
I firmly believe that everyone has a role and a purpose on this earth; mine was right here being an emergency physician. After a brief celebration with John’s family, he came over to me and said, “Dr. Coleman”; I immediately corrected him and said, “Please call me Jerry. “ He said, “Sure, Jerry, come outside, I have a surprise for you.” John was a lifelong motorcyclist and had an obsession for Harley motorcycles. During his ICU stay, I learned from numerous conversations with his wife that John’s goal was get back on his bike and ride again. When I stepped outside of the ED ambulance entrance, I saw a huge Harley Davidson bike sitting there. John asked ”Hey Jerry, you gave my life back, can I take you for a spin.” I stated, “I would love that, but John, my patients are waiting, I hope you understand. Can I take a raincheck on this one?” He understood. We embraced with a handshake that turned into a “man hug.” He again said thank you. I simply stated, “John, I did what I was trained to do, trying to save lives and alleviate suffering.” I walked back through the doors of the ambulance entrance, and picked the next chart with a renewed sense that I am doing what I was meant to do.
What I learned from this case is that life is far too short. Sometimes through personal life experiences or extraordinary cases such as this one, we are reminded that we need to take a step back and realize what is truly important in this world. Take time to enjoy life’s simple pleasures; tell people you love them unconditionally because you never know when your time is up.

1 Comment

Resources for EMS Trainers Available Online

Help train your EMS team with these free resources developed by ACEP, the National Stroke Association, and Genentech at www.EMS4Stroke.com.

In addition to interactive lessons, an online EMS Toolkit includes these modules:

  • What is stroke? — Understand the impact of stroke and identify stroke symptoms
  • The role of EMS in stroke assessment and care — Examine goals for EMS response times, become familiar with commonly used stroke scales, and study pre-hospital management of stroke
  • Stroke systems of care — Learn about the classes of hospitals that treat stroke, recognize standards for primary and comprehensive stroke centers, and be able to contribute to best practices for stroke according to designated protocols
  • Case studies — Practice proper pre-hospital stroke management with examples

Access the course today at www.EMS4Stroke.com.

 

, ,

No Comments

Should Emergency Medicine be Carved Out of Payment Reform?

Should Emergency Medicine be Carved Out of Payment Reform?

Should emergency physicians advocate that they be carved-out of payment reform?  There may be no easy answer to this question, at least not yet; and in any case, advocating to be an exception to the transition from fee-for-service to pay-for-performance and risk-sharing may be a waste of time and effort.  The tide is clearly turning, though not as quickly as payers and government regulators might wish; and it would appear that eventually, every physician and hospital will be subjected to various incentives and disincentives to provide better care for less money, or perhaps less care for less money.  Even if the Affordable Care Act is killed by the Supreme Court, along with the provision of this act that mandates “paying more to doctors who provide quality care at lower cost to Medicare, and reducing payments to physicians who run up Medicare’s costs without better results”; this snowball is already rolling.  The question for ACEP and emergency physicians is:  do we scramble to get out of the way, or hitch a ride?

One of the considerations at issue is the attribution problem.  Lots of different providers impact the care of emergency department patients, and what gets done to and for them.  Unlike most physicians’ offices, the ED is an open practice.  Physicians often send their patients to the ED to get tests and procedures and treatments that the physician could perform, or order, in a lab or outpatient radiology suite, or consultant’s office.   One-stop shopping is quick, its easy, and it gets the patient out of the doctor’s office, allowing better turn-around.  Consultants call or come to the ED and order all sorts of tests and treatments, and sometimes these orders are attributed to the treating ED physician.  When physicians are financially at risk for the cost of caring for their patients, or are simply tracked and compared with each other regarding these costs; attribution is an important issue.  Under payment reform, determining how a physician’s decisions impact the cost of care involves many complicated adjustments related to the patient’s health care issues, and the roles of other physicians involved in the patient’s care.  According to Dr. Berwick, the former administrator of CMS, this “may be the most difficult measurement challenge in the whole world of value-based purchasing”.  These adjustments are even more difficult to make in an open practice like the ED, where the most expensive care is often the result of a multi-provider team effort.

Another consideration relates to the impact of payment reform incentives and risk-sharing on medical decision-making in the context of a medical emergency.  In the middle of a heart attack, do you really want your ED physician factoring in how he or she will be judged, or compensated, by how little is spent on your care; or trying to shift critical time dependent decisions to some other provider down the road?  Here’s an example:  the ED physician can look at your ECG and make the expensive decision to call in the cath lab team in order to reduce the time it takes to get your coronary artery open, saving heart muscle and maybe your life.  Or, he can call the cardiologist to come in and make that decision, wasting critical minutes, but putting the cardiologist on the hook for the cost of this decision.  Of course, the obvious answer is to make the entire team responsible not only for costs but also outcomes, which is what bundled payments, capitation, ACOs, and integrated health care systems are designed to address.  But don’t think for a minute that paying the entire team for performance is going to entirely mitigate the impact of these cost-cutting incentives.  Ask seniors how they feel about health care payment reform under Medicare: for the elderly, and most everyone, incentives for physicians to skimp on needed care is frightening.

So far, things like bundled payments and capitation have been focused on scheduled, elective, non-emergency care, because it is easier to predict and monitor the relative contribution of the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, the primary care doc, the pathologist, and so on.  In an emergency, care is less predictable, and it’s more difficult to attribute medical decision-making to one or another provider; and frankly, cost-cutting is a bit more risky, and cost-effective care perhaps more difficult to achieve.  I suspect, however, that this will not deter the payers, because emergency care is also more expensive.  If emergency care providers expect to be able to ride the train of fee-for-service forever, carving themselves out of payment reform, they will likely be disappointed.  Either they will be tagged as an expensive commodity that payers will try to work around (using the EMTALA mandate as cover, and non-payment as one of the tactics – as in the Washington State Medicaid non-payment policy), or they will be subsumed into hospital employment or mandated participation in PHOs or ACOs or other risk-sharing ventures that undoubtedly will undervalue emergency physicians’ services and undermine their current paychecks.  Unless, that is, these emergency care providers find ways to practice cost-effective care, and participate successfully in shared-savings and other at-risk incentive programs, in a responsible, caring, and efficient manner that ensures good outcomes, saves patients and payers money, and incidentally preserves their own incomes.

This post also appears in The Fickle Finger:  www.ficklefinger.net/blog/

, , , , ,

No Comments

Senate Committee Accepts New Language in Bill Regarding Drug Shortages

A bill that requires drug manufacturers to report to the FDA when a shortage is on the horizon – or when a drug would be discontinued – recently received two additions that would help physicians as they battle shortages in emergency departments. ACEP, working with several other emergency care organizations, was instrumental in getting language included in the bill that states “a sterile injectable product” or “used in emergency care or during surgery” would also qualify. The legislation currently sits in the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions legislation. The Senate HELP committee is scheduled to meet April 25. Similar legislation will begin working its way through the House Energy and Commerce Committee next week. The FDA reports that shortages have increased since 2010, when it listed 178 drugs that were in short supply.

No Comments

Annals Audio/Podcast April 2012 – It’s ON

April highlights for the audio/podcast:
-Controversial data: no mortality benefit of regional STEMI centers
-A safe chest pain protocol with early discharge and selective stress
-Nurse-administered procedural sedations in Uganda
-Sublingual opiates – an option
-Standards for Rh testing
-Intravenous access by EMS – too much?
-Preventing acute mountain sickness – what works

Email us at annalsaudio@acep.org
Hear you soon,
D&A

No Comments

Your Opinion is Important to Us

Sandra Schneider, MD, FACEP, ACEP Past President

I would like to personally invite you to become a member of the Emergency Medicine Practice Research Network – EM-PRN. Becoming a member is simple; just click on this link and answer a brief survey. It will take less than five minutes. We want to know if you are seeing patients with chronic pain, we want to know if you are experiencing medication shortages and how you are coping. We want to know how you practice. YOUR ANSWERS will provide ACEP with essential information for our advocacy in Washington and improving emergency care. To stay a member, all you need TO DO is to agree that you will complete 3-4 surveys, five minutes or less, each year.

Membership at this time is only open to ACEP members, residents, attendings and life members. Sorry, we cannot as yet accommodate non-members or medical students. Many other specialities have built practice research networks. Pediatrics has had one for more than a decade. They started small, like us. They have found that getting data from physicians on the front lines is often very different than getting it from inner city, teaching hospitals. Once you join EM-PRN, you will be able to do much more than just give opinions to survey questions. We want to submit ideas for research projects and survey questions that YOU would be interested in. Our group will pick the more interesting and the most popular IDEAS for the next survey. So you not only will be providing answers, you’ll be designing the questions.

Right now and for the next few years, EM-PRN will be largely surveys. Eventually, we will likely want to grow to collect some data. For example, IN THE FUTURE we might want to monitor the number of patients seen with chronic pain in emergency departments. You would simply count the actual number of patients you see during a single shift (no names, no identifiers) and submit it to ACEP.

We could then monitor this number over time to see if it is increasing, decreasing or staying the same. The members of EM-PRN will help direct what research projects we consider and will be acknowledged on any publication. Members will also receive the results of any project ahead of publication. So in the time it has taken you to read this Blog, YOU could contribute to advancing our knowledge of the real practice of emergency medicine. Join now.

www.acep.org/em-prn

 

 

, , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

The Boy With the Headache

Please send YOUR story to Tracy Napper at tnapper@acep.org.

 

 

 

 

 

Tonight a 17 year-old boy came to the emergency room complaining of headache. As I entered his room, in my usual hurry to do an assessment as expeditiously as possible, so as to get on to the next case and attempt to avoid the inevitable backup of patients so common in our ER, I was struck by the vulnerable demeanor of the patient before me. The triage nurse’s report assured me that the temperature and other vital signs were normal (unlikely to be the dreaded meningitis, I thought) and that no trauma has prompted this visit.

At the youth’s bedside sat his mother, a woman of about forty years. She waited quietly with a soft, though concerned and vigilant look on her pretty face. Early on in the encounter she informed me that her son had been having occasional headaches for two years but that the symptoms had worsened in frequency and intensity over the past couple of months. Not only were the headaches worse, but the boy also wanted to sleep a lot and was “difficult to wake up.” My thoughts immediately turned to a possible diagnosis of some sort of brain lesion, namely a tumor, though rare in this age group, nevertheless consistent with the presenting symptoms. While conducting the physical exam, with special attention to the neurological system, I asked the mother if her son had ever had a CT scan during the time he has been suffering from these headaches. She remarked that indeed he had undergone such a test two weeks earlier, when one of my colleagues had evaluated him in our ER and that the scan had been normal.

This news gave me some measure of comfort, though MRI is a more sensitive method for ruling out a brain tumor. I now headed down the migraine pathway as the route most likely to lead me to the correct diagnosis. Certainly there was a migraine history in the family and this young man was a likely candidate for such an affliction. Dear God, let it be migraine, I silently prayed, so I can treat it and get on to the next patient. I could see that the ER was getting busier and I, the sole physician on duty, would pay the price of keeping other patients waiting.

I quickly reviewed in my mind the facts of the case, but the most remarkable feature was the mother’s insatiable need for reassurance that her son had no life-threatening condition.

Initially, the young man would not respond to my inquiries as to the nature of his headache, such as when it started, where exactly it was located, whether he felt nauseated or had any visual disturbance, ie, the usual questions asked of every patient presenting to the ER with pain in the head. I began to appreciate his mother’s concern that he just wanted to sleep and was difficult to wake up. Finally, suspecting that he really could hear and understand me, I took the assertive maternal approach and told the boy to sit up and cooperate with the exam. Much to my relief he responded in an appropriate manner, a clear sign that his level of consciousness was not impaired, an important thing for me to know.

Yet, he looked so sullen.

By the third time his mother asked if I was sure he was all right and I was beginning to wonder what on earth was causing her so much worry, when I had, I thought, in my usual caring and compassionate manner, done everything I could think of to allay her fears, she remarked, ”I’ve already lost one son, I couldn’t bear to lose another.”

Suddenly any hope of getting out of that room quickly and on to the next patient was seriously compromised. I was now compelled to ask the inevitable question of what had happened to her other son. Thoughts of a dreaded, rare, familial disease that presented with headaches and took the lives of children, and which I could not remember from my medical school days, raced through my mind. I glanced at this pathetic-looking woman, whose desperation I could feel in my own heart, and, as gently as I could, asked the awful question.

“He was murdered two months ago,” she said, with what must have been more courage than I could only imagine a mother could muster up. Her words stung me. Suddenly the whole case took on a different light and as I looked again at my young patient I now saw the obvious face of grief and depression.

Often in a busy ER doctors and nurses alike, because of a myriad of stresses inherent in the work, become impatient with and, at times, intolerant of some of the members of society who “bother” us with seemingly minor complaints, especially if they are repeat visitors to our hospital. Everyone knows that teenagers tend to be moody, uncooperative individuals who often don’t want to get out of bed. But how many of us have ever had to endure what this young lad had experienced? His older brother, his idol, has been killed, shot by two men who hijacked his car and left the young man and his companion dead in a Florida orange grove. Why would anyone want to get out of bed again after that?

Emergency medicine is a challenge, to say the least. Each 12-hour shift teaches something. Patients come and go. Life hangs in the balance.Sometimes the pace is frenetic and survival (my own) is questionable. Many people come to our doors and we may never know what pains lie hidden in their hearts. Usually the diagnosis is easy, the physical problem obvious and treatable. Though life-threatening events happen every day in the ER, in most cases we can make a positive difference, occasionally even saving a life.

The problems of the heart (not in a cardiac sense) are often the most difficult to treat.

I am reminded each day that life is precious, that today might be my last on this earth, that I am honored and privileged to be an ER doctor and to be entrusted with the health and lives of the many patients who seek sanctuary inside our doors.

But every once in a while I stop to reflect and savor the moment and one such time was tonight when, after having a heart-to-heart talk with a wounded mother and her son, a 17-year old boy gave me a hug as he left my ER.

Marlene Buckler, MD, FACEP

No Comments

Stroke Education for EMS Professionals

ACEP, the National Stroke Association, and Genentech have partnered to develop a FREE stroke education course for EMS professionals.  The course covers the basics of stroke, pre-hospital assessment, stroke systems of care, and case studies.

EMS educators may also download the slides and use them in their EMS education.

Access the course today at www.EMS4Stroke.com.

 

, , , , , ,

No Comments